Google Translations

« Beyond Self Actualization | Main | Emerging Church and the Holy Spirit [2] »

November 07, 2005



While I agree with your hijaking metaphor, I think there is something more fundamental going on (no pun intended). It appears that a carpenter has looked at Emergent and gone away disappointed that it doesn't look like a nail as he expected.

The truth is, sad as it might be for those attempting to "nail" down a description, anything that's truly emergent will look different at different times. The only way to know whether it is working under the the influence of the Spirit is to look at the fruit produced. And we all know that Paul defined the fruit of the Spirit to be love.

Timothy Wright

1 Corinthians 2:3-5 (New International Version)

3 I came to you in weakness and fear, and with much trembling. 4 My message and my preaching were not with wise and persuasive words, but with a demonstration of the Spirit's power, 5 so that your faith might not rest on men's wisdom, but on God's power.

When I read your article this scripture came to mind. And I also agree with what your saying. I think we talk out of our own experiences, and we live in that world. I wouldn't want to equate Power Evangelism with walking in the authority and the power of the Holy Spirit.

My concern with Emergent is that Emergent means that all gods lead to Jesus, and that the Jesus that I follow is not the same Jesus that Emergent follows. Looking forward to reading you other upcoming blogs.



i appreciate your hi-jacked metaphor too, im wondeing if EC hasn't branded our their/our own metaphor for spirit... and added to definition that gifts are more of a self help addage for personal growth, than 'as needed for the moment tool'.

it seems to me that a big difference in approaches from 'gift' perspectives is that 'the vineyard theology" you mentioned seems often centered around 'demonstration for proclaimation' vs the EC 'manifestation for maturation'...

im just rambling now, but i am looking forward to your next post... and wish i could make the roundtable discussion.

i can't wait for you next installment


Really good thoughts, these. The church I am with comes out of a Vineyard background and is kind of fumbling and stumbling toward something new (call it "emerging" if you like). So I often feel like I'm being tugged in two directions at once... because there is a real gap between these two "theologies" - there is a perception they cannot co-exist.

But I am dreaming about some kind of both/and theology of the Spirit, instead of the either/or of "power manifestations" vs. "growth manifestations." I guess you could call them loud works of the Spirit and quiet works of the Spirit. I have seen fruit borne through both, but have yet to see a theology and praxis that successfully holds the two together, treating each with equal respect, acknowledging with equal praise all of the works of the Holy Spirit.


Good thougths. I got the Link to here from Jason. I'm thinking along similar lines myself so good to hear others doing it too.

Will look forward to reading and thinking more.



This is a very important debate. I lead a largish church with six congregations - one of which is a very small emerging church (see the link to the blog)
I've had a gut feeling that the Spirit is lacking somehow, but since our meetings avoid preaching and singing (delibarately) maybe it's just my prior expectations of how the Holy Spirit works that are too limited. Certainly when we had an evening where we focused on the things of the Spirit one person recieved what classic pentecostals would call the Baptism in the Spirit.
Incidentally, I agree with some of Don Carson's book (Becoming Conversant with The Emerging Church)from a conservative perspective but think he's too hard line. The new expressions need time to play, discover and discard the dross. Don't they?


Well put Derek. The time to play is vital. It's what all good parents do...


Time indeed.
The whole notion of dumping Roman/Top>Down structure is so utterly alien and seemingly impossible that, personally, I take great pains to go slow as possible in what ways and places and times our church here in Pompey is meeting/feeding back.
Some of the church miss meetings, and this really shows in their eagerness to meet in any form! While others like me are very wary of anything remotely organised!!!

This issue of power is bizarre! I've neverhad more words-of-knowledge and other such things at work than since our church went "unchurched". Let alone Holy Spirit felt in conversationand life lived with workcollegues and other *nonchurch* now absorbed into our *church*.

But I am noticing a more Liberal, even Universal bent in fellow*unchurched* christians, some of whom are part of EC.


Still thinking- and blogging a bit about this stuff myself too.

Just to respond to Tim, not everyone who calls themselves emergent have gone pluralist. I often find myself on the very liberal wing even of emergent when I suggest that all roads may lead to God!


I totally dissagree with Chris's coments in his article and am really supportive of what I hear from Brian Mclaren (whom most/all of Emergant critiscm seems to get leveled at) and I've just finnished the first of his books that i've found and enjoyd it allot. Although I'm not always comfortable about the distaining tones that emergant folks often talk about the charismatic movement with as if most of the rest of the church body deserve's respect and tollerance but you can kinda get away with talking down to charismatics, now I'm with allot of folk not the biggest fan of charismatic culture but think we should respect the churches and work of God within it.
I think there is a nature within Vineyard being part of the Last wave of change in one stance to shun this new change not wanting to admit that it is no longer the new thing.

On a side note if you look outside of emergant but inside of the emerging at house church's for instance you can often find an over flow of manifestation's of the Holy spirit esspecially out of the west. see see james rutz "Mega shift".

Miracles, healing's, tounges and prophesy although not the be all or end all of the church surely have their own place in the work of God and should not be ignored, dissmised as myth or as something that only really happens very rarely or just back in the past of back when the first apostles walk the earth.


"I think there is a nature within Vineyard being part of the Last wave of change in one stance to shun this new change not wanting to admit that it is no longer the new thing."

Wise words. And nor will Emergent be. Question is, will it have the nous to remember this in.... let's say, 10 years time, when it becomes, like Vineyard said it never would, an established denomination with logos and hierarchies and bills to pay?

I hope so.


I'm of the personal opinion that rather than being devoid of the Spirit in terms of Power, the EC is actually a profound work of the Holy Spirit beyond the Charismatic/Pentecostal churches. Indeed, I think this may be its defining characteristic. Remember that the Holy Spirit always, by nature, points to Christ.

The problem with these latter movements is they got so caught up with all the cool things they could do in the Spirit, they lost sight of the Spirit's primary goals in this world. And thus, while they talk a good game, they are as limited in their understanding of the Spirit's work as any other denomination, though limited in different ways and thus seemingly more profound.

The EC, from what I can tell, is correcting a lot of these errors and in various ways better reflecting the fullness of the Spirit's work, even if the emphases are no longer on the various "showing off" gifts. In my estimation, the so-called charismatic gifts aren't denied, as they are in many Evangelical churches, but rather they are assumed and no longer set apart. The mission of the Spirit is not to put on a show but to save the world and draw believers into an ever deeper relationship with the Triune God. How this works out may require all manner of different gifts, but these gifts should never, as they have in the Pentecostal Church, themselves become the emphasis.

The comments to this entry are closed.