« June 2006 | Main | August 2006 »

July 31, 2006

SNAFU

 41949774 Qanatoys Afp203BBack from a great break... Great times in the Italian sun, arguing about football over good food and drink. And an amazing week in Cornwall, just to prove that the UK has it all too: incredible beaches, weather and... pasties.

But there was always a tinge of sadness. Like Jonny the Middle East has really been getting me down. It's all that's wrong with religion and politics. The poor suffer, the verbals continue to drop like the missiles, the vulnerable die and the rich fly home.

I'm reminded of Jesus' invitation for anyone without sin to cast the first stone... So many have been cast on all sides, and none are justified. Yet I can't get away from the fact that Israel is being totally disproportionate. Like a once-hurt kid with their bigger, badder brother now by their side, they kick hard. 1000 times harder, in terms of pounds-of-explosives ratios. And turn and spin and project their enemies as mad terrorists.

This is the true fall-out of 9/11: name your enemy a terrorist and the rules are suspended. No ceasefire. It's the new game. Invented by the coalition. It stinks. And everyone's playing it.

SNAFU.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

July 16, 2006

This Blog is Now on Holiday

The Amalfi CoastTuscany coast, then down to Cornwall.

Back beginning of August.

Catch you soon ;-)

July 10, 2006

The 3rd Economy: Gift, Market and Plunder [4] | Power Discourses | Mission | Plunder

[ Gift, Market and Plunder [1] ] | [ Gift, Market and Plunder [2] ]
[ Gift, Market and Plunder [3] ] | [ Gift, Market and Plunder [4] ]

In the third post in this series - in which I am exploring an update to the ideas of gift presented in the book - I presented this table:

Picture 2

Bouncing off Veblen's work 'Conspicuous Consumption', I have proposed a 3rd economy beyond 'gift' and 'market' - the economy of 'plunder' - and suggested that this is often the default mode of exchange in the fractured city.

However, lest we rest too comfortably, I'm also concerned that this economy has also been prevalent in many kinds of mission and evangelism.

To quote from Pete Rollins' great book How (not) to Speak of God:

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Continue reading "The 3rd Economy: Gift, Market and Plunder [4] | Power Discourses | Mission | Plunder" »

July 09, 2006

How many EC Bloggers Does it Take to Change a Light Bulb?

In the great tradition of such things, I propose:

1 To change the bulb and post about it

315 To lurk around and make no comment

2 To propose a stack of del.icio.us tags the poster should have put in

16 To complain he should have used categories

4 To flag up a conference on nu-media emerging bulb ministries "The LED Shines in the 80% Greyscale-ness" in Ukraine.

Technorati Tags:

Continue reading "How many EC Bloggers Does it Take to Change a Light Bulb?" »

July 06, 2006

Glass Works

Just wanted to flag up Saga Arpino's site cataloguing and promoting her work. A recent post-grad of the Royal College of Art, Saga is fine artist, a Vaux accomplice, and her award-winning work in glass is fantastic. Order some for your space now.

Saga 1

Technorati Tags: , , ,

July 05, 2006

The 3rd Economy: Gift, Market and Plunder [4] | Urban Implications

[ Gift, Market and Plunder [1] ]  |  [ Gift, Market and Plunder [2] ]  |  [ Gift, Market and Plunder [3] ]

OK, sorry if the last post was hard work. But sometimes you have to mine deep...

1134507145To summarize for those who didn't make it: Veblen identified the 'leisure class' as those who typically don't lower themselves to proper work, but rather flit around doing 'trophy' occupations. He uses the hunter as an example of this, which drew me back to Lewis Hyde's thoughts on Maori hunting rituals and the nature of gift exchange, and thus to reflect on a 3rd economy of 'plunder' to go with gift and the market.

In the hunter analogy:
The gift-hunter (typified by the Maori) kills in the forest, offers cuts to the priest, who offers it back to the forest. A virtuous gift-cycle that binds hunter to priest to forest to hunter.

The plunder-hunter (typified by Veblen's aristocrat hunters) kills in the forest and hangs the stuffed heads as trophies on the wall. A vicious anti-gift cycle.

In the food analogy:
Gift: people round for dinner. Market: buying from the supermarket. Plunder: theft or exploitation of food resources.

So what the hell is this all about, and why does it matter to us? Well, to quote from the end of the last post:

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Continue reading "The 3rd Economy: Gift, Market and Plunder [4] | Urban Implications" »

July 03, 2006

The 3rd Economy: Gift, Market and Plunder [3] | Relationships and Transactions | Hunters and Plunderers

[ Gift, Market and Plunder [1] ] | [ Gift, Market and Plunder [2] ]

In the previous two posts I've begun reflecting on Thorstein Veblen's Conspicious Consumption thesis about 'the leisure class' - a group of people he identifies who feel that work is somehow below them:

'The upper (leisure) classes are by custom exempt from industrial occupations, and are reserved for certain employments to which a certain degree of honour attaches. Chief among the honourable employments in any feudal community is warfare; and priestly service is commonly second to warfare.'

He also adds to warfare and priestly service governance and sport, and goes on to explore how:

'When the community passes from peaceable savagery to a predatory phase of life [...] the activity of the men more and more takes on the character of exploit. Tangible evidences of prowess - trophies - find a place in men's habits.'

I've suggested that this implies a change in the thinking I set out in the book, and adds a third economy to the pair of market and gift. I've decided to call this the 'plunder economy', and, like the other two, has its own relational characteristics, which I want to set out here before exploring what the implications are for us in terms of urban spirituality.

I've often used the examples of food transaction to think about these different economies. The economy of the gift is characterised by having someone round for dinner. It would be a) offensive to offer to pay for the meal at the end of the night and b) strange if the gift was not reciprocated in some way at some later date. In the gift economy there is a movement of the empty place - and thus a virtuous circle of relational potential built up.

The market economy is analogous to going to a restaurant, or the supermarket. You pay your money, and get your food. The scales are balanced, so there is no 'empty place' to move, and thus no relational potential. For better or worse, the market is typically relationally benign. You don't go hugging the chef after a meal and demanding they must come over to your place some time. The money deals with it.

So as an example of the plunder economy, I'll suggest another culinary situation: stealing food from a shop, or walking out without paying. In many ways, plunder is thus 'anti-gift'. There is an empty place again, but it is a place of hurt, a place where relationships are destroyed, not built up. And this empty place is in danger of moving on, as people seek to fill their empty place by plundering themselves. A vicious, not virtuous circle.

On the surface then, it seems we can summarise things this way:

Picture 1-2


Lewis Hyde has expressed much of the idea of gift using hunting as another analogy. (See my chapter on Gift in The Complex Christ) But we can now expand on this and contrast it with Veblen's view of the Victorian 'leisure' hunter as plunderer. Hyde's hunters saw their activities as part of a cycle. The forest gives prey to them, they give the food to the priests, the priests offer it back to the forest. Veblen's hunters are in no way part of such a cycle. They take from the forest, and hang the stuffed heads on the walls as trophies. By thus emptying the forest, but not replacing, they will destroy the eco-cycle. And what they fail to recognise is that this will, by turn of the vicious circle, destroy them.

Plunderers are therefore a symbol of those who consider themselves outside of life's cycles. Outside of the normal economy of work. Outside of the cycles of gift that sustain us. And outside of any ramifications that might have. They, like the celebrities I have mentioned are one modern equivalent, consider themselves immortal.

And its to the implications of this 'set apartness' - you might call it holiness, self-righteousness - of the plunderer that I want to turn to next. Because I think we have been guilty of collusion with this economy more than we might think.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,